Certified Questions of Law Currently Before the Court of Appeals

September Term, 2021

For further information, please contact the Clerk's Office at 410-260-1500.

 

 

Paul Moore v. RealPage Utility Management, Inc. - Misc. No. 1, September Term, 2021

Certified Question from the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

Question: Does Md. Code Ann., Public Utilities § 7-304 prohibit the use of energy allocation equipment and procedures, which have not been approved by the Public Service Comission, to bill energy charges to tenants of properties built prior to 1978?

To be argued in the September, 2021 session of Court.

Counsel for appellant: Benjamin Howard Carney and Martin E. Wolf
Counsel for appellees: Syed Mohsin Reza, David M. Gettings, and Timothy J. St. George

 

Jabari Morese Lyles v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. - Misc. No. 3, September Term, 2021

Certified Question from the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

Question: If a credit grantor is found to have knowingly violated Credit Grantor Closed End Credit Provisions ("CLEC"), Maryland Code Annotated, Commercial Law §§12-1001, et seq., does CLEC § 12-1018(b) require the credit grantor to return three times: (1) all amounts collected by the credit grantor in excess of the principal amount financed; (2) only those amounts collected that the borrower contends violate the CLEC (in this case, the convenience fee); or (3) some other amount.

To be argued in the October, 2021 session of Court.

Counsel for appellant: Cory L. Zajdel, David M. Trojanowski, Jeffrey C. Toppe
Counsel for appellees: Laurie G. Furshman, Robert J. Brener

 

Westfield Insurance Company v. Michael Gilliam - Misc. No. 4, September Term, 2021

Certified Question from the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

Question: For purposes of determining the reduction of a plaintiff's underinsured motorist benefits required by Maryland Insurance Code 19-513(e), does Maryland law treat the "write-down," or the difference between medical bills submitted by a workers' compensation claimant's health care provider and the lower amount actually paid by a workers' compensation insurer to satisfy those bills, pursuant to the Maryland Guide of Medical and Surgical Fees, as "recovered benefits" to the plaintiff under the Maryland Workers' Compensation Act?

To be argued in the October, 2021 session of Court.

Counsel for appellant: David A. Skomba, Ellen R. Stewart
Counsel for appellees: Peter J. Basile, Daniel S. Baurer, Matt M. Paavola

 

Jesse J. Murphy, et al. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. - Misc. No. 5, September Term, 2021

Certified Question from the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

Question: Did the Court of Appeals act within its enabling authority under, inter alia, the State Constitution and the State Declaration of Rights when its April 24, 2020 Administrative Order tolled Maryland's statutes of limitation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic?

To be argued in the December, 2021 session of Court.

Counsel for appellants: Joseph Larry Katz
Counsel for appellee: Shannon L. Briglia and Shoshana Elise Rothman

 

Nagle & Zaller, P.C., et al. v. Jamal E. Delegall, et al. - Misc. No. 6, September Term, 2021

Certified Question from the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

Question: The Maryland Consumer Loan Law, Md. Code Ann., Commercial Law §§12-301, et seq., applies to consumer "loans" made by "lenders," and requires a "person engaged in the business of making loans" to be licensed. Based upon the allegations in the Third Amended Complaint, is Nagle & Zaller, P.C. subject to the statute?

To be argued in the December, 2021 session of Court.

Counsel for appellants: Shirlie Norris Lake and Alexander V. Cranford
Counsel for appellees: Richard S. Gordon, Benjamin H. Carney, Sara E. Assaid, and Alexa E. Bertinelli

 

 

Joel Adam Dickson v. United States of America - Misc. No. 7, September Term, 2021

Certified Question from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Question: Under Maryland Law, can an individual be convicted of robbery by means of threatening force against property or threatening to accuse the victim of having committed sodomy?

To be argued in the December, 2021 session of Court.

Counsel for appellant: James Wyda and Sapna Mirchandani
Counsel for appellee: Robert K. Hur and Elizabeth G. Wright