|
D R A F T JUDICIARY POLICY ON PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS I. Purpose of Policy; Scope; Findings A. Purpose of Policy - In light of the increasing computerization of documentary materials received or made by the units of the Judicial Branch of State Government, the increasing demands for access to those materials, and the increasing State and national concern about the privacy rights of persons whose personal information is contained in those materials, the Judiciary finds that a policy is needed to establish guidelines to supplement the existing laws governing access to public records. The guidelines established by this policy are intended to assure public access to information about the operations of the units of the Judiciary, and the official activities of its officials and employees, without unnecessary interference with those operations and activities or unwarranted invasion of the privacy of a person in interest. B. Scope - This policy applies to public records maintained by units of the Judiciary. It is intended to supplement the existing laws governing access to public records and not to supersede any laws that exempt designated public records from public access. C. Findings - In order to achieve this result, the Judiciary finds that there is a need to establish guidelines governing: (1) Requests for access to public records made in person at a courthouse;II. Definitions As used in this policy, the following words have the meaning indicated: (1) "Court Information Officer" means
the Court Information Officer of the Judiciary.
III. Requests A. To Whom Made - (1) Except as otherwise provided
in subsections (2) and (3), requests for access to inspect or for copies
of court records or land, licensing, or other records shall be made to
the custodian of the respective records.
B. Requests for In-person Inspection or Copying of Records - (1) Generally - A person desiring
to inspect or copy a court record or land, licensing, or other record shall
make an oral or written request to the custodian of the respective record.
If the request is oral, the custodian may require a written request if
the custodian determines that the disclosure of the records is questionable
or the request is so involved or lengthy as to need further definition.
The request must clearly identify each record requested so that the custodian
can locate the record without doing extensive research. If the person making
the request is unable to clearly identify the record requested, the custodian
may refer the person to the appropriate index of records and advise the
person how to use the index to search for a record.
C. Mailed Requests for Copies of Records - A person mailing in a request for a copy of a court record or licensing or other record must clearly identify each record requested so that the custodian can locate the record without doing extensive research. A person mailing in a request for a copy of a land record must identify the record by its official recording reference. D. Telephone Requests - A custodian is not required to ascertain the existence of a court record or land or other record in response to a telephone inquiry; a custodian shall ascertain and disclose, in response to a telephone inquiry, if a specified type of license was issued to an identified person in a designated year. If a person is unwilling or not reasonably able to come to the courthouse to examine the appropriate index to ascertain if a record exists, the person may submit a written request for a copy of the relevant page or pages of the appropriate index. The custodian shall advise the person making the telephone inquiry of the number of index pages involved and the per-page copying cost. E. Large Scale Requests for Copies of Computerized Records - (1) A person requesting copies of large quantities of computerized court records or land, licensing, or other records shall submit a written request containing: (a) The name, address, and daytime telephone number of the person;(2) Continuing requests for documentary materials not yet received or made will not be considered. (3) The custodian shall consult with the computer support personnel of the Administrative Office of the Courts to ascertain if the request is unduly burdensome and, if not, the cost for the copies requested. A request is considered "unduly burdensome" if it may strain the system capacity through extensive use of computer processing time to retrieve and download the records, may cause delay in services provided by the computer support personnel to the courts or other units of the Judiciary Department, or require extensive employee work hours to complete the request. If the request is determined to be unduly burdensome, the custodian may require the person requesting the copies to modify the scope of the request or to agree to a segmented or delayed delivery of the copies. F. Requests for Dial-up Access - (1) A person requesting dial-up access to court records or land, licensing, or other records shall submit a written request containing: (a) The name, address, and daytime telephone number of the person;(2) Upon payment of the reasonable costs by the person requesting dial-up access, the Court Information Officer shall grant attorneys and law firms and public agencies directly involved in court cases dial-up access to court records. Upon payment of the reasonable costs by the person requesting dial-up access, the Court Information Officer may grant dial-up access to persons engaged in a government activity or a business that requires access to court records or land, licensing, or other records for a legitimate business use. G. Requests for Data Compilations - (1) The Judiciary Department is not required to create compilations of data. The Court Information Officer may grant a request for data pursuant to this section. A request for data from records that are exempt from public access shall be denied. (2) A request for data shall be in writing and shall contain: (a) The name, address, and daytime telephone number of the person;(3) The criteria against which a request for data is evaluated by the Court Information Officer is: (a) The specificity of the request;(4) The Court Information Officer shall consult with the computer support personnel of the Administrative Office of the Courts to ascertain if the request is unduly burdensome and, if not, the approximate cost for satisfying the request. A request is considered "unduly burdensome" if it may strain the system capacity through extensive use of computer processing time to locate, aggregate, and download the data, may cause delay in services provided by the computer support personnel to the courts or other units of the Judiciary Department, or require extensive employee work hours to complete the request. (5) The person making the request
shall bear the cost of honoring the request for data and shall sign a contract
to that effect. The data shall not be released until the cost is paid,
unless the Court Information Officer elects to waive the cost. Costs may
be waived if the request is made by an agency or instrumentality of the
State or if the request is made by a person affiliated with a nonprofit
organization in connection with a project that has a significant potential
to benefit a governmental or other public purpose.
|